Model-Glue 3 Preview

I noticed a post earlier today about the upcoming Model-Glue 3 framework. I have to be honest I took a look at the framework I think at version 1 and at that time was using a self "rolled" framework that suited my needs. Prior to that I experimented a bit with Fusebox back in 2000 (I didn't inhale honest) but never went much further than experimentation.

Since moving to Germany last year I was plunged into the deep end of Fusebox 5 and while I sometimes find the framework a bit "heavy" it's working rather well for us. Then I watched the sneak peak video and

[More]

Comments
Joe Rinehart's Gravatar Hey Gary,

Thanks for the second look.

Just wanted to note that the Flex framework is a kind of cobbled-together proof of concept, and it's not really "production" grade.

Cheers,

Joe
# Posted By Joe Rinehart | 4/10/08 12:57 PM
Sean Corfield's Gravatar Fusebox 5.1 added "some support" for SES but Fusebox 5.5 has full support. Fusebox 5.5 also appeals to a lot of people because you can, if you want, completely skip the XML and use convention instead. Fusebox 5.5 also features a scaffold generator to automatically generate circuits, fuseactions and fuses from your database (MS SQL Server only right now but other DBs will be supported in due course).
# Posted By Sean Corfield | 4/11/08 2:34 AM
Gary's Gravatar @Sean,

Thanks for correcting me on my version mistake :)
I will take a look at the automated scaffolding feature as well as the SES, it is definitely a plus over the "normal" URLs.
We pretty much use sql server exclusively in house so the automated scaffolding may be useful too.

I think the different active frameworks "deserve" a review every once in a while to reevaluate wether or not they fit for a particular project.
# Posted By Gary | 4/11/08 4:22 AM